Dear Honorable Justices of the Supreme Court,
I am writing to express my concerns regarding the proposed ban on TikTok, an action that I believe raises serious questions about the protection of free speech and the broader consequences for millions of Americans. While I understand the importance of addressing national security concerns, the arguments supporting this ban appear to lack substantive evidence and disproportionately target a single platform, creating a dangerous precedent.
TikTok has become more than a social media app—it is a cornerstone of modern communication, business, and mental health support for millions of Americans. Over 150 million people in the United States use the app, and it has directly contributed to the growth of countless small businesses and individual entrepreneurs. Creators have built entire livelihoods by reaching audiences on TikTok, many of whom would have otherwise been unable to grow their brands or businesses. Additionally, TikTok has helped individuals pay off medical debt, crowdfund emergency expenses, and find creative outlets to cope with mental health struggles. For many, this platform has been a lifeline, providing not just economic support but also a sense of community.
If TikTok is banned, these creators and business owners stand to lose their income streams overnight. This could lead to a wave of unemployment claims, as many individuals depend on this platform for their primary income. The government would effectively be dismantling an entire digital economy without offering a viable alternative for those impacted.
Moreover, banning TikTok raises profound First Amendment concerns. The app has provided a platform for freedom of speech and press, allowing individuals to share their perspectives, stories, and knowledge in ways that were never possible before. Silencing such a large segment of communication undermines the constitutional rights of millions of Americans.
The claim that TikTok is a national security threat has yet to be substantiated by credible evidence. Meanwhile, other platforms—such as Facebook and Google—have been found guilty of selling data to third parties, including entities from foreign countries, yet no similar actions have been taken against them. It appears TikTok is being unfairly singled out, possibly due to its origins rather than its actual practices. A more balanced approach, such as the implementation of comprehensive data privacy laws that apply equally to all platforms, would better address concerns about national security while respecting the rights of citizens.
I urge the Court to carefully consider the constitutional implications and real-world consequences of this ban. In a digital age, platforms like TikTok are extensions of our right to free speech, press, and assembly. Taking away this tool without clear evidence of harm not only erodes these freedoms but also disrupts the lives of millions who rely on it.
First sent on January 17 by Elizabeth
