I am writing to express my deep concern regarding the recent petition by the Trump administration seeking the Supreme Court’s approval to dismiss Mr. Hampton Dellinger, the head of the Office of Special Counsel (OSC). I respectfully urge the Court to decline hearing this case, as doing so could undermine the essential protections afforded to whistleblowers and compromise the independence of the OSC.
The OSC plays a pivotal role in safeguarding federal employees who courageously report misconduct, ensuring they can do so without fear of retaliation. Mr. Dellinger, appointed in 2024 for a five-year term, has been instrumental in upholding these protections. His abrupt dismissal on February 7, 2025, without the legally mandated justification, raises significant concerns about the erosion of statutory safeguards designed to maintain the OSC’s autonomy.
Federal law stipulates that the Special Counsel can only be removed for “inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance in office.” This provision ensures that the OSC operates free from political influence, fostering an environment where federal employees can report wrongdoing without apprehension. U.S. District Judge Amy Berman Jackson’s temporary injunction reinstating Mr. Dellinger underscores the importance of adhering to these legal protections.
The administration’s appeal to the Supreme Court challenges these established safeguards and, if entertained, could set a precedent that jeopardizes the OSC’s independence and the broader framework of whistleblower protections. Such a development may deter federal employees from coming forward with critical information, fearing unjust retaliation.
In light of these considerations, I respectfully urge the Supreme Court to decline taking up this case. Upholding the integrity of the OSC and the protections it offers to whistleblowers is paramount to ensuring transparency and accountability within our federal institutions.
Thank you for your attention to this pressing matter.
First sent on February 17 by BlueCollarJew
