I applaud the Supreme Court's narrow decision to uphold the separation of powers and our constitutional system of government. By allowing the district court's order for USAID payments to proceed, the Court has reaffirmed that the executive branch cannot simply disregard funding appropriations passed by Congress. This preserves an essential check on presidential power. However, I am deeply troubled by Justice Alito's dissent, which contained overt factual inaccuracies regarding the district court's actions. His claim that the judge issued a "second order" due to "frustration" blatantly misrepresents the record of three prior orders the administration defied. For a Supreme Court justice to rely on demonstrably false statements rather than truthful recitations of the case history is unacceptable and erodes public faith in the judiciary. Justice Alito's dissent signals a concerning disregard for facts and adherence to an ideological agenda over impartial analysis. I urge the Court to remain a source of evenhandedness and constitutional fidelity during these turbulent times.
First sent on March 6 by Coleman
